Quantcast

Don't have an account? Register Now! Forgot password?

Maximum IT
Columns

Beep Beep go the Open-Source Jeeps

comment Commentsprint Printemail EmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponRedditFacebookSlashdot

Open-source software is a pretty familiar concept to most geeks.  But what about an open-source car?  The idea is more than just a theoretical mash-up of computing terms and the automotive world.  Quite a few companies are working to bring the collaborative nature of open-source idea generation to the pavement, and some of their prototypes certainly blow the best of today's auto market right out of the water.  At least, they're pretty stunning in the design department.  Because that's the problem with a piece of hardware as complicated as an open-source car -- a concept is one thing, but execution seems to be a bit more difficult than creating a piece of software.

First up is the Common car.  It's actually called "c,mm,n," minus that extra comma in the end--that's actually for grammar's sake, not a part of the name.  I'll leave it to you to decipher exactly why the Dutch originators of the concept decided to forgo vowels in the naming of this smart car-lookalike.  Still, this prototype automobile caught my eye, as it was just recently on display at the big Amsterdamn car show, AutoRAI.  

The details of the car are geared toward maximum sustainability.  That's why you're not going to find a gas engine in the C,mm,n.  It's a hydrogen-powered, zero-emissions vehicle that's attempting to use open-source as the backbone for future engineering creativity.  The originators of the C,mmm,n vehicle hope that tinkerers of all kinds will contribute their ideas and technical know-how to the car's design--initially on a Wiki set up by the developers, but beyond that, in social groups and garages of their very own.  At the very least, C'mm'n needs a translator, as much of the official site's English version is still wrapped in the mysteries of Dutch.

EDAG, a German company, recently unveiled its own open source vehicular prototype dubbed, "Light car - Open Source."  It's safe to say that this, too, will be a car whose features can be tweaked and modified by members of the community.  Although it's unclear whether EDAG will be as open to the general public with its schematics as the C,mm,n prototype.  It seems that EDAG is willing to partner with other developers to further enhance the "Light Car - Open Source's" innovative technology.

The lithium-ion-powered car's futuristic exterior is accentuated by OLED lights, transforming the car's paneling from a slick, opaque design into a customizable, lit-up informational display.  Drivers can allegedly customize the outline of the car's various lights as they see fit--an unheard-of technique that's sure to turn sports logos into brake lights, should this car ever see the light of day. Drivers can apply these same levels of customization to the interface panels inside the car, as well as the car's rear.  EDAG envisions a future where drivers can gleam information about the road and condition of the car in front of them just by staring at the informative, changing display on its butt.  Car-to-car communications--can it be done?

Third on the list is the OScar.  But I mention this more to round out a full list than anything else.  Established in 1999, the concept for this open-source, community-driven car design seems to have fallen by the wayside in the past few years.   While the originators agree that the OScar is more than just a vehicle, perhaps they've found the most success in helping the rest of the community realize the potential of open-source development as it relates to complicated, everyday hardware.  For I can't ever see a working, tangible OScar reaching the light of day--the site's primary documents haven't even been updated since 2006.  And the main forums?  Totally down.  

If anything, the plight of the OScar serves as a gentle reminder of the old, unrepeatable adage related to ideas.   A lot of people have ideas.  A lot of people banded together on a common principle can turn their ideas into a wonderful, open-source discussion.  And sometimes, even a product might emerge from the fruits of their labors.  But building a car ain't like dusting crops--given how resilient the market is toward anything that doesn't run on gas in some variety, it's difficult to envision a future where lofty, high-tech ideas like hydrogen-powered vehicles and open-source skip hand-in-hand through the production line.

COMMENTS
avatarLike the time Herb asked

Like the time Herb asked homer simpson to design the "car for the every day man".

 

_______________________________

"There's no time like the future."

Login or register to post comments
avatarim sorry but why do all

im sorry but why do all "concept" cars all look like the designers smoked way to much weed before drawing up? is it just me or is most concept cars ugly as shit?like dont get me wrong i like the idea what there trying here but why make the car ugly as hell? i sure as hell wouldnt drive one of them nor ride in one of them just cause they look like they sat to close to a fire and melted. god damn they are ugly

Login or register to post comments
avatarThe biggest problem with an

The biggest problem with an "open source" car is the safety certification a car has to go through, Unless there's going to be some soft of blanket cetification for the base chassis/engine/exhaust/safety systems which then can't be modified, EVERY single version will need to be put through the government testing wringer.

And Keith...lighten up, man!

Login or register to post comments
avatarYour crazy is showing....

These are open concept cars, not a politically driven intentional affront to your delicate sensibilities.  As one of the reasons my dad had to give up his MGB Convertible for a Dodge Dart, I can say it's not a new problem. Someone in El Cerrito got lucky.

And by the way, were you out there complaining when the Bush administration  started writing those reports?  How about donating to the EFF to fight the Bush wiretapping and torture and other illegal shenanigans?  Its 12 weeks into the Obama administration and you're just now getting mad about the Bush administration?  You might have a lag problem, like about 8 years of lag.  I understand all the conservatives have left is rage and self pity but come on.

Login or register to post comments
avatarYou say that..

..like the Dart is a bad car.  As long as it wasn't a slant-6 4 door, I would take any Dart over the MG.  At least I fit in the Dart.

Login or register to post comments
avatarsounds like a neat idea

but if the cars are going to be that ass ugly then to hell with that

Login or register to post comments
avatarSo I'm sick of the cars of

So I'm sick of the cars of the future are only for single people or people without children. I saw that smart car and thought what the fuck would I be able to do with that? That's what liberals want everyone to drive a 2 seat smart car. I've got 3 fucking children. 3 car seats that need to be secured down. And here is a clue, there are alot of people with children asshole, alot. So quit making these god damned smart cars that are super tiny and then telling the world this is the car of the future because it's a car I can never buy. How about designing the smart family car or would that go against liberal ideals that is pro abortion and anti family? Because that is what it comes down to.

Liberals have already labeled every american military an extreme right wing republican wacko. That is what one of the liberal politicians said.

This has everything to do about politics. When you see these cars of tomorrow they are all 2 seaters. The Obama administration put out requirements for US automakers to produce 2 seat electric and hybrid cars in order to recieve stimulus money. 2 seat just like everyone of those Open Source cars. 

Login or register to post comments
avatar "[...] because it's a car

 "[...] because it's a car I can never buy."

 Where are those 3 children gonna be in 18 years or less?

Never is a very long time.

 

 

Login or register to post comments
avatarand you have no friends?

and you have no friends? Family? Pets?

 

I agree these 2 seaker cars of the future asume that EVER DRIVER is basicly a lonly single, looser who would never under any circimstances need more then one extra seat. I don't know about you but i have atleast 2 friends...what if we all want to go somewhere together? you know...like a bar, a movie, ComicCon? 

Login or register to post comments
avatarIf you want...

...a futuristic car you should have kept it in your pants

Login or register to post comments
avatarYour comments produce a

Your comments produce a great deal of shock and awe, Keith.  I don't even know where to begin.

On a side note, you do realize that you could open-source up your own 4-door sedan version of any of these cars?  Submit a design proposal!  Or a comment!  Or an idea!  Ahh, open source...

Login or register to post comments
avatarFlee. It's a consipracy.

Flee.

It's a consipracy. Simmer the heck down, it's concept cars, not the end all to your transportation problems.

Also lol @ politics. You're mixing things up a lot. You realize there's 1) Not only Americans in the world creating concepts 2) Not only American liberals, as you seem to imply...

Login or register to post comments
avatarA. Its just a step in the

A. Its just a step in the right direction.  Even the 1st combustion engine cars started out as 2 seaters and were only good for piddling around.

B. Condoms.

Login or register to post comments
avatarwhy do artists always think

why do artists always think that futuristic cars have to look like gigantic baby toys?

you would definitely not catch me in one of these things.

Login or register to post comments
avatarLOL @ giant baby toys

You are so right!

Login or register to post comments

This Month's Issue
FEATURE How to Get FREE Programs, Services, Software & MoreFEATURE Digital Photo Printer RoundupHOW TOBuild a 3D CameraFEATUREDIY Arcade PCWHITE PAPERHow TRIM Works