Awesome PC Upgrades from Budget to Extreme
Posted 02/17/09 at 11:30:00 AM by The Maximum PC Staff

Upgrading is an obligation of any self-respecting PC geek. It’s an affirmation of your thirst for power, a healthy rejection of the status quo. Upgrading is an acknowledgement of the fact that there’s always a way to improve your rig. You may have the funds for premium parts—lucky you. We’ll tell you exactly what those parts are. But even if your means are more modest, there are affordable parts in every major component category that can breathe new life into an aged PC.
Regardless of your financial situation, you must address some important questions before embarking on an upgrade. First, you need to honestly assess your rig’s merits. You shouldn’t waste money upgrading your PC if it still sports an AGP slot or a pre-AM2 Athlon 64 motherboard. The question you should ask yourself is whether it’s more cost effective to gut the machine and replace its primary components—motherboard, CPU, memory, and videocard—than it is to do a piecemeal retrofit. If you look at your rig and decide to build new, check out our full build-a-pc guide, but if you’re ready to proceed with an upgrade, click to find out how!
Intel CPUs
The hot new Core i7 offers something for everyone


Intel’s Core i7 is everything the company said it would be: fast, furious, and even inexpensive. Those with an eye toward extreme computing should settle for nothing less than Intel’s 3.2GHz Core i7-965 Extreme Edition (www.intel.com). It demolishes Intel’s Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and does one of those Jedi cut-you-in-half tricks to AMD’s best, the Phenom X4 9950 BE. With its integrated memory controller, tri-DDR3 support, Hyper-Threading, and Turbo mode, the chip is simply untouchable at encoding tasks, or anything else that will exploit the eight threads available to it.
But if a grand is a little too rich for your blood, take heart. Intel already has a pretty darn good budget chip based on the Core i7: the 2.66GHz Core i7-920. It outperforms the 2.83GHz Core 2 Quad Q9550—and costs less, too! One caveat for true budget hounds: The Core i7 requires an LGA1366 board, not to mention three sticks of DDR3 RAM for optimal performance, which significantly adds to the expenditure.
If you don’t want to go that far with your CPU upgrade, Intel’s Core 2 Quad Q6600 ($185) gets you quad-core performance that’s compatible with most modern Intel motherboards.
RAM
It pays to go name-brand

Quick, what’s the difference between name-brand RAM from respected manufacturers and the generic stuff you get after sorting by lowest price? Blue screens, my friends. While people tend to treat RAM like it’s all the same, it really isn’t. That’s why we’ve long recommended that when you buy RAM, you first consult your motherboard’s QVL (Qualified Vendor List) and then reach for name-brand sticks. Name brands are especially important if you intend to overclock the crap out of your memory. Many high-frequency modules require a ton of voltage, which tends to drastically shorten the life of the memory. Buying a name-brand product means good warranty support, which could come in handy.
How much RAM should you run today? For a 32-bit OS, 2GB is the minimum. For higher-end configs, consider 4GB on Phenom and Core 2 platforms and 6GB with your 64-bit Vista install on Core i7.
AMD CPUs
They’re all budget over here

We admit that it’s pretty difficult to recommend an extreme AMD chip when the company’s absolute top-end CPU sells for a measly $175 bucks. Hell, it costs less than Intel’s two-year-old bottom-end Core 2 Quad Q6600. Still, we understand that some folks are vehemently opposed to Intel CPUs purely on religious grounds. For you AMD diehards, we wholeheartedly recommend the 2.6GHz Phenom X4 9950 Black Edition (www.amd.com). Based on the tried-and-true AM2+ platform, the CPU uses DDR2 RAM, which is cheaper than air; plus, there’s a possibility that the new AM3/DDR3 CPUs will also work with the platform.
So what about the really hardcore budget shoppers? You know, like that friend of yours who, when you suggest splitting an order of fries, actually counts the fries out. Well, first we’d say, dude, just get the X4 9950 BE, you cheap bastard. But then again, he did actually tear the last fry in half, so he would be happy to step down to the 2.1GHz tri-core Phenom X3 8450 ($105) if it could save him a few bucks. Yeah, it’s likely a quad-core washout, but your friend doesn’t care. It’s like getting a scratched and dented fridge—it’s not pretty, but it still keeps the Diet Coke cold.
extreme upgrades
Submitted by hentaiboi on Thu, 03/19/2009 - 5:01pm
why dont you change the 4 1.5TB seagate harddisks to 4 2TB WD green power harddisks and also 3 GTX 280's to 4 GTX 295 OC edition
I hope this is the last time
Submitted by billysundays on Tue, 02/17/2009 - 12:40pm
I hope this is the last time they mention that shitty Envision monitor
I agree 22" LCD's are doing
Submitted by Keith E. Whisman on Tue, 02/17/2009 - 12:49pm
I agree 22" LCD's are doing to LCD's what Netbooks are doing to laptops.
Unfortunatly....
Submitted by knexkid on Tue, 02/17/2009 - 4:29pm
Unfortunatly some of us can't afford huge screens and the PCs to power them. My $200 Acer 22 inch has been spectacular and I love it.
Well my gripe isn't with the
Submitted by billysundays on Tue, 02/17/2009 - 6:26pm
Well my gripe isn't with the size, but quality. For example, with your Acer, when sitting in front of it at a usual distance, looking at white page, is the whole screen a shimmering yellow except for a small circle in the middle about 6 inches in diameter. I'm guessing not.
What I really don't like
Submitted by Keith E. Whisman on Tue, 02/17/2009 - 9:14pm
What I really don't like about 22" monitors is that almost all of them use a 6bit color gamut and they don't tell you that and they are almost always limited to a max res of 1680X1050. I want a 24" LCD with a res of 1920X1080 and use an 8bit color gamut and I want ads and the color gamut to be displayed on the box. It's either an 8bit or it isn't. Sure some hocus pocus bullshit may get you close to 8bit but it's not going to be as nice and brilliant as an honest to goodness 8bit display. Sure the 22" 6bit displays are cheap but why in the heck aren't the 8bit 24" displays coming down in price? More people are willing to buy a cheap 22" monitor and that keeps the monitor manufacturers from selling the 24" 8bit monitors in large numbers. 22" needs to be seen as not enough for everyone. We need the demand for 22" monitors to fall on the nicer 24" monitors instead.
Seagate 1.5TB...the new Deathstar
Submitted by darkkknight on Tue, 02/17/2009 - 9:43am
I know Max PC focuses on raw power/speed/capacity, but how about reliability? The fastest/biggest drive in the world that BSOD constantly or dies after a month is not worth it. This drive has been on the "Best of the Best" list forever, and now recommended again in the upgrade list. I blindly headed over to Newegg and Amazon to pick this drive up based on your recommendation, only to be directed to the message boards talking about the problems with this drive.
Please consider reliablily more with your recommendations, I would rather have slightly slower seek times to get a product that works well for a long time.
Heres a million or so google hits on this problem:
http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENIN295&q=seagate+1.5tb+problems&aq=0&oq=seagate+1.5tb+p
This is a quote from one of
Submitted by Keith E. Whisman on Tue, 02/17/2009 - 10:52am
This is a quote from one of the google hits from the URL that you posted. I own two 7200.11 Seagate Baracuda hdd's the 1.5Tb and the 500Gb and have had no problems with either one. I purchased my 500gb last March and my 1.5Tb two weeks ago.
Attention: Firmware Update Fix Available
Seagate has isolated a potential firmware issue in some Barracuda 7200.11 hard drives and related drive families based on their platform, particularly drives manufactured between July and November 2008. In some instances, data on the drives may become inaccessible when the host system is powered on. To determine whether your product is affected, please visit the Seagate support website for more info and to download the fix.
This quote is from this Amazon URL from your hits list.
http://www.amazon.com/Seagate-1-5TB-32MB-Drive-ST31500341AS/dp/B00066IJPQ
Um
Submitted by ArrecBarrwin on Tue, 02/17/2009 - 6:29am
What about two GTX 295 boards? Those are the fastest cards currently available, so why are you reccomending 4870X2s for the "extreme" end of the upgrade?
They wrote this article for
Submitted by Keith E. Whisman on Tue, 02/17/2009 - 10:57am
They wrote this article for the paper magazine like Four or Five months ago and it's just now hitting the website. The GTX295 just came out in the end of December-January.
Single Slot?
Submitted by periodhyphenund... on Tue, 02/17/2009 - 1:46am
Quote:
The best thing about the X2? The board enables high-resolution gaming
at 1920x1200 and 2560x1600 while taking up just a single slot
4870 X2 Single Slot! Hmmmm
I think you've had enough to drink for one day
On sli and crossfire capable
Submitted by Keith E. Whisman on Tue, 02/17/2009 - 2:02am
On sli and crossfire capable mobos there are usually 2-3 PCIX-X16 slots that are spaced far enough apart to allow 2-3 dual slot video cards. I think they meant 1 slot as in two gpu's in 1 X16 pciX slot instead of taking up 2 X16 pcix slots for the same grahics capabilities. Nobody really cares about available X1 pcix and pci slots anymore since most everything else comes built in the mobo.
I'm Nobody
Submitted by spurdy on Tue, 02/17/2009 - 7:37pm
I'm Nobody and I care about PCI and PCIX slots. I haven't seen any motherbords with intragrated sound that isn't worthless or if it is good it requires a PCIx. For those of us who use our pc's as media servers also need a PCI for HD TV tuners, as I have yet to see one itegrated in a motherboard and Nobody has a SLI system so PCI slots become important . So as you speak you for Nobody, please call Nobody first and make sure that you and Nobody are on the same page.
SP
I should rephrase that as
Submitted by Keith E. Whisman on Tue, 02/17/2009 - 8:36pm
I should rephrase that as I'm like you I still enjoy my Creative Soundblaster Xfi but alot of people are sacrificing their PCI and PCIx X1 slots in favor of Bi and Tri SLI and Crossfire. Now a days you have Doby live and push the audio through optical cables to your speaker system like I can with my Logitech Z680 speakers you really aren't sacrificing much considering there are no longer any DirectSound API's for Vista and Windows 7. If I had three GTX280's I would pull my xfi card out with great reluctance but I would do it to get stupid high FPS at unheard of resolutions with everything turned up to extreme levels. I think Dream Machine 2007 or was that 2006 used on board audio because of the Crossfire setup.
As an Upgrade may I suggest
Submitted by Keith E. Whisman on Mon, 02/16/2009 - 11:30pm
As an Upgrade may I suggest if you have 4gigs and a 64bit os try upgrading to 8gigs or more, also the GTX280 video cards cost $300 dollars now. You just can't go wrong with a GTX280graphics card. It's freaking awsome. I bought one and it's faster than my previous SLI'd 8800GTS 640MB video cards. It's like alot faster than that sli setup. The 8gigs of RAM really improve the performance of Crysis and in a bigger way 8gigs of ram lets me play GTA4 with max settings. If anyone tells you 4gigs is enough I can't disagree more but only when it comes to gaming and Picture/Video editing and encoding.
I kept getting website
Submitted by Keith E. Whisman on Mon, 02/16/2009 - 11:31pm
I kept getting website unavailabe errors and then I reloaded the page and I have a double post. Perhaps due to others posting at the same time?
Okay really now?
Submitted by D.E. on Mon, 02/16/2009 - 11:26pm
Not every game benefits from SLI, and neither does the performance double by having two cards. If you are getting 30fps in Crysis with one card, getting two doesn't mean you get 60... I still fail to see how it is a viable option to people as a means of upgrading power.
Compatability issues, diminishing returns, and here we have this blog talking about setting up 3 cards on one rig...
Of course, if you have money just lying around, I can see people throwing in SLI into their rigs but I would much rather reach for a higher end CPU and even more ram/better ram and harddrives before considering it. So why do you guys from maximum PC consider SLI so mainstream...
Have you ever set up an SLI?
Submitted by Keith E. Whisman on Mon, 02/16/2009 - 11:38pm
Have you ever set up an SLI? It does offer great performance. And with the now stable and relitively reliable drivers you do see an equal ramp up in frames per second especially with mid range to high end graphics cards. I saw an instant and incredible increase in my gaming performance back when I first added my second 8800GTS video card. I plan on purchasing another GTX280 graphics card when I upgrade my display unless the current highend graphics cards are way faster than an SLI GTX280setup.
Okay just no...
Submitted by D.E. on Tue, 02/17/2009 - 6:55am
I upgraded from an 8800GT to a 280GTX. I still cannot max out many of my games and saw only a slight performance gain. The 280GTX sorry to say was not worth a $500 upgrade for me, it was not the end all and be all that people touted it to be, and now people are saying that I need to SLI or TRI-SLI these things to get even more juice out of them? Sorry no thanks.
An 8800GT to a GTX280 you
Submitted by Keith E. Whisman on Tue, 02/17/2009 - 5:50pm
An 8800GT to a GTX280 you should have seen awesome performance increases I'm blown away by mine. What kind of CPU and how much ram do you have because that can have something to do with it and also are you using the latest drivers for everything and what resolutions are you gaming at because the higher the resolution the better. At 1680X1050 your going to see excellent performance but at really low resolutions at around 1024x768 your CPU is going to be doing alot more of the work. And at 640x480 it's almost all CPU limited. But also if you haven't enough PSU capacity and you have a super slow processor or little ram that can hinder the performance of your video card. Pairing an GTX280 with a celleron or pentium processor will certainly be counter protective.
Should have went ATI
Submitted by GreenTurtle on Tue, 02/17/2009 - 4:38pm
I upgraded to a pair of 4870's in crossfire a saw some crazy results!!! and for not much more than the Nvidia 280
EDIT* That was before Christmas, I just checked the egg and I can't believe how much Nvidia cards have dropped !!!!
Still diggin' my 4870's though :)
Feature
Review
Feature
Feature
Feature






