AMD Radeon HD 6990 Performance Preview
Double the GPUs, double the performance, at almost double the price.
AMD’s dual GPU cards have come a long way in the past several years. The original Radeon HD 3870 was noisy, ran hot and didn’t always perform up to snuff. Since then, AMD’s Catalyst Driver suite has substantially improved the performance and breadth of CrossFire-supported games.
On the hardware side, AMD is pulling out all the stops with its Radeon HD 6990 card. The company understands that a dual GPU card is most appealing to a small band of enthusiasts who really want the card to push the edge of the envelope, both in terms of engineering and features.
Despite being fully twelve inches long—like its predecessor, the Radeon HD 5970—the HD 6990 looks a little less imposing than the 5970. Maybe it’s the center-mounted fan, which visually breaks up the huge mass of the cooling shroud.

The Radeon HD 6990 combines twin Cayman GPUs, 4GB of GDDR5 and a new cooling system.
Still, it’s a big, heavy card that will only fit in larger PC cases, so make sure your case has the room for it.
The HD 6990 is essentially two Radeon HD 6970 cards built onto one card. While the base core clock speed is down a bit, at 830MHz, the full 6970 has been replicated, complete with 3,072 total shader ALUs, 192 texture units and 4GB of GDDR5 running at 1,250MHz.
A pair of HD 6970 GPUs and all that GDDR5, even with the core clocks cranked back to 830MHz, consumes serious power; the HD 6990 ships with two 8-pin PCI Express power connectors. Also built into the card is a tiny physical dip switch that allows you to overclock and overvolt the core clock with a single flick, to 880MHz. Flicking that switch turns the 6990 into full, screaming dual HD 6970s, but at a hefty power cost. At full throttle, the overclocked HD 5990 used 528W—more power than we’ve ever seen from a single graphics card. The card itself, when overclocked, consumes up to 450W, which requires serious voltage regulation. AMD touts its use of Volterra digital programmable regulators and cherry-picked GPUs which would run at high voltages and clock speeds without melting.

The dual Volterra digital regulators are the rectangular chips at the top. The two GPUs are symmetrically laid out.
Cooling dual Cayman GPUs and 4GB of video RAM takes a serious cooling system. AMD re-engineered the cooling system, incorporating a full-board heat dissipation system with dual vapor chambers.

The heat sink fins each cover a separate vapor chamber located above each GPU. The copper head sink is thermally linked via phase change thermal interface materials.
The central fan pulls heat from the rearmost GPU, pushing that air over the front GPU. Since all the video connectors are mounted on one side of the double-wide PCI bracket, the other bracket side becomes a full-height exhaust vent.
The HD 6990 ships with five video connectors built in, one dual-link DVI connector and four mini-DisplayPort 1.2 attach points. Retail boxes will ship with three additional adapters, one miniDP to single link DVI passive, one miniDP to single link DVI active and a miniDP to HDMI passive.

Four mini-DP 1.2 ports plus a dual link DVI connector enable full Eyefinity support.
So the Radeon HD 6990 seems well engineered. How does it actually perform? We cranked up the standard testbed, loaded up the benchmarks and took it for a spin. We compared the HD 6990 (with the OC switch in both settings) to an overclocked eVGA GTX 580 SC, and the previous generation Radeon HD 5970.
Any lingering doubts as to who is the new performance champ are now gone. In games that are seem mostly bandwidth or texture bound, we see little difference between the OC setting and the standard setting. It’s worth noting that we did see games crash on a couple of occasions when the card's switch was set in the OC setting, while the 6990 was completely stable at the standard setting.
So for the moment, AMD gets to hoist the PC graphics performance crown onto its brow. But fame and GPU fortune can be fleeting, and already rumblings of a dual GPU Nvidia-based card have hit the Internet rumor mills.
Will you want one? At $699, the price is pretty steep, especially if you consider that a single Radeon HD 6970 costs about $360. Also, it’s a big card, so make sure you case has room for a foot-long card. And you’ll need a robust power supply to deliver all that juice.
Nevertheless, the temptation is there – that’s a lot of raw GPU power on a single card. The price of GPU glory is never a small one.
$699 (est) http://www.amd.com
| Radeon HD 6970 | eVGA GTX 580 SC | Radeon HD 6990 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shader Units* | 1536 | 512 | 3072 |
| Texture Units | 96 | 64 | 192 |
| ROPs | 32 | 48 | 64 |
| Power Connectors | 1 x 8, 1 x 6 | 1 x 8, 1 x 6 | 2 x 8 |
| Core Clock Frequency (MHz) | 880 | 797 | 830 (std), 880 (OC) |
| Memory Clock Frequency (MHz) | 1250 | 1012 | 1250 |
| Frame Buffer Size | 2GB | 1.5GB | 2 x 2GB |
| Memory Interface | 256-bit | 384-bit | 256-bit |
| Price | $360 | $520 | $699 (est) |
*AMD and Nvidia computer cores are not directly comparable.
| eVGA GTX 580 SC | Radeon HD 6990 Standard | Radeon HD 6990 OC | Radeon HD 5970 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 2011 (Extreme) | 2,021 | 3,259 | 3,404 | 2,509 |
| 3DMark Vantage Perf. | 23,888 | 27,495 | 27,854 | 24,654 |
| Unigine Heaven 2.1 (fps) | 36 | 50 | 53 | 28 |
| Crysis (fps) | 36 | 61 | 61 | 44 |
| BattleForge DX11 (fps) | 78 | 100 | 101 | 73 |
| Far Cry 2 / Long (fps) | 122 | 149 | 151 | 114 |
| HAWX 2 DX11 (fps) | 158 | 143 | 146 | 102 |
| STALKER: CoP DX11 (fps) | 58 | 89 | 92 | 54 |
| Just Cause 2 (fps) | 52 | 71 | 71 | 55 |
| Aliens vs. Predator (fps) | 44 | 77 | 80 | 49 |
| F1 2010 (fps) | 72 | 87 |
86 | 80 |
| Metro 2033 (fps) | 26 | 39 |
38 | 20 |
| Power @ idle (W) | 141 | 160 |
160 | 169 |
| Power @ full throttle (W) | 395 | 477 | 528 | 364 |
Our test bed is a 3.33GHz Core i7-975 Extreme Edition in an Asus P6X58D Premium motherboard with 6GB of DDR3/1333 and an 850TX Corsair PSU. The OS is 64-bit Windows Ultimate. All games are run at 1920x1200 with 4x AA.
Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
LatiosXT
March 09, 2011 at 4:21pm
Other reviewers say it's not exactly worth it considering...
- CrossFireX is unofficially supported
- Noise from the fan at full blast is around 70-80dB, for reference, GTX 480 was at around 60dB
- Two 6970s are cheaper, cooler, quieter, and performs just as good.
![]()
THE_REAL_MAVERICK
March 08, 2011 at 10:32pm
Wow that baby is incredible, that is a huge jump in performance. I mean, we just got the 580's but wow, this smackes it so bad. I personally won't buy it because who spends 700 bucks on a video card? not me. I applaud AMD for such a statement and hopefully it can keep good competition between the two companies so we get good prices as consumers.
![]()
BouJhi
March 08, 2011 at 11:54am
they keep putting 2 gpu core on a single platform. its "2x" the performance, but, since heat and noise is a big issue, they turn it down, figure out the rest, and now we have the amd shoutout.
Nvidia is ze way, they have the EVGA Hydro Copper 2, thats a 700 card in value, performance and how long the card will actually last.
I wouldnt say that card is the pinnacle directx 11 card thou. that would be the 8800 or the 9800 GTX by nvidia. they have the right enough power to handle TODAYS directx 9 games or less. lets see, that was 2006 and 2008, and today they are worth about 100USD or less.
and lets compare it to when portal came out. 2007
so... what im wondering is.
why is battlefield 3 in directx 9.
![]()
cpuking2010
March 09, 2011 at 2:06pm
Because xbox 360 is only in DX9. Major game studios do not catter to PC. Take a look at crytek and Crysis 2. Build it on the console port it to the PC is how it's done now.
![]()
Phrish
March 08, 2011 at 9:55am
I'll admit I'm an SLI fanboi, but I might weigh DisplayPort into my next purchase decision. These cards have been DP for a while (hehe.... "DP"), while nVidia seems stuck on DVI-D. Shucks, I'm surprised that geForece is using anything more advanced than VGA at all.
![]()
gothliciouz
March 08, 2011 at 8:01am
finally you can run crysis four years after its release, metro 2033 its not playable though, at least frame rate-wise speaking.
![]()
Emeraldflame
March 08, 2011 at 10:01am
Why is metro 2033 not playable framerate wise, the average person can only see around 28-32fps with the naked eye, while obviously you would get dips in performance here and there that might cause jitter the 6990 is pulling off that game plent enough to play.
![]()
Nimrod
March 08, 2011 at 11:21pm
complete and total bullshit. the only people who say this are idiots who have crappy computers and cant get more than 5 any way.
![]()
cpuking2010
March 09, 2011 at 2:12pm
I'm gonna have to dissagree with you I can only hit 32 FPS on Dirt 2 with my current setup but It does not effect my abilty to play the game nor does it hurt the performance much.
![]()
jelyman
March 08, 2011 at 6:14pm
Not even close. I'd say more like 120 fps
http://whisper.ausgamers.com/wiki/index.php/How_many_FPS_human_eye_can_see
You have to factor in blurring of the frames. In games, that blurring doesn't exist like it does in movies or TV shows.
Have you ever watched something on a 60hz TV versus a 120hz TV? Although the motion looks a bit faker, you can see the difference.
![]()
kevaskous
March 08, 2011 at 5:52pm
....that is hardly true man, even the fricken military prooved this wrong already with their fighter pilots...whom they directly compare to advanced gamer's, especially in FPS....
![]()
DDRDiesel
March 08, 2011 at 7:29am
You're got to remember, this card is technically running Crossfire, which is why the bench results spank anything else out there right now. Get a pair of 580's in SLI mode and run the test again; I guarantee the results will be much closer if not lead to nVidia ahead of the game as usual. Just saying...
![]()
CaptainFabulous
March 08, 2011 at 8:56am
Yeah, for a cool $1000, $300 more than this card. For the same amount of money you can get three 6970s in triple crossfire that will dust two 580s. Just saying...
![]()
blimpboy3
March 08, 2011 at 11:45pm
2 570s cost the same as this or less these days and im sure can deliver more performance
![]()
mbahrani
March 07, 2011 at 10:46pm
Do i get one or buy two 6970, I currently have 5970 , I dont see that much difference
![]()
MattyMattMatt
March 07, 2011 at 11:28pm
Buy two 6950s and unlock them to full 6970s. Run you 500-550... so saves a lot of cash.
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.


















