Print
Time for another price and parts guide! The $1000 parts guide we posted earlier this month garnered much discussion and debate among readers, so we wanted to a better job explaining our choices in this edition. Compared to the pricey decked-out systems from OEM builders like Falcon and Digital Storm, $1500 isstill technically in the "budget" range . But for many people, that's still a lot of money to spend on a PC. We catered this build for gamers, and anchored our picks on the GPU and CPU, while judiciously choosing the other parts and brands to fit into our budget limits. The results were pleasantly surprising, and recent price cuts and rebates across the board really helped. Of course, your own configuration may vary wildly from ours depending your own needs, priorities, or brand allegiances,but we think this is an awesome configuration for something building a new gaming PC.
(All prices found on newegg.com, as of March 23rd, and do not include mail-in rebates, tax, or shipping)
We started off this build with the video card, since we wanted something that relatively high-end, and anticipated that it would take up a considerable chunk of our $1500 budget. Initially, we considered options that would give us enough money left for a Core i7 CPU and motherboard. A single Nvidia GTX 280 was the first card we considered, since prices for it have fallen after the release of the ultra high-end GTX 295 and 285 models. The 4850 X2 was also another viable choice, since for $300 it delivers a better price/performance ratio than the top mid-range Nvidia offering. But then we remembered the 4870 X2, which held the title for fastest single-slot solution before the GTX 295 was released. Amazingly, PowerColor sells its 4870 X2 on Newegg for $401, and even clocks it higher than ATI reference boards. At this price, the pick for GPU was a no brainer.
For a $1500 gaming PC, it would be an insult if we didn't recommend an Intel Core i7 CPU. Nehalem is pretty much the only choice for a top of the line processor, since AMD's Phenom II has been relegated to compete at the mid-range level. The only real decision in this category was which Core i7 SKU to use. We have no qualms going with the 2.66GHz 920 part, even if it represents the "budget" end of the Core i7 lineup. The 920 performs tremendously well compared to even the best Core 2 CPUs, and smashes Phenom in most of our benchmarks. It's also very easy to overclock, so you can stretch your $280 investment a long way.
Since we're using a Core i7 CPU, we have to pair it with an X58 LGA 1366 motherboard that supports its socket. Our favorite X58 board is currently the MSI Eclipse, but its no frills companion SKU, the MSI X58 Pro, is just as capable and reliable. In fact, we haven't had issues with any of the X58 boards we've tested so far, so the only big differentiating factors are SLI support and overclocking features. And since we're running an ATI-based 4870 X2 in this build, SLI is unnecessary as an upgrade path -- Crossfire will work fine here. The Eclipse is almost double the price of the X58 Pro at $350, so we're happy with the cost savings we made here. Alternatively, the Asus P6T Deluxe ($290) is also a fine choice, and supports SLI.
We don't review power supplies in the magazine, but we've used enough of them in the lab to have a good feel for what's reliable and trustworthy. PC Power & Cooling is our typical first choice, but we've also recently been very satisfied using Corsair's HX1000 PSU. Modular power cables, six 8-pic PCI-E connectors, and a plethora of SATA power cables ensures that you'll have plenty of opportunity (and power) to upgrade your system with more video cards, optical drives, and hard drives.
With RAM prices continuing to stumble, we see no reason why you shouldn't buy 6GB of memory for you next gaming PC. 6GB runs on three dimms in tri-channel mode on X58 motherboards, and OCZ's DDR3 series delivers exactly what you need for gaming at a great price. These sticks run with 7-7-7-20 memory timings, and should be stable at the stock voltage settings. Of course, you'll need a 64-bit OS to make use of all this memory.
Comments are closed on this article
Philips
September 25, 2011 at 12:11pm
Thanks for the guide. The new processor is enticing. The newest parts are awesome.
ponchato
April 19, 2009 at 9:53am
How well are 64-bit OSs supported? I've heard horror stories of software incompatibilities, but that was around 2007... will it cause any problems if I do run 64-bit Vista?
flyingformosan
April 09, 2009 at 3:34pm
I'm building my rig using a very similar setup (MSI X58 Pro, Diamond 4870X2, Corsair CMPSU-850TX) and I'm wondering if there is any LAN box case or micro tower that can host the same setup?
skeptic
April 04, 2009 at 6:07am
I realize it is only April 4, but I went searching for some of the parts listed above and have yet to find one listed at the price shown in the article. Everything I found was more expensive than what was listed, even after trying to find the products at multiple places. Can we get an update for April to reflect current prices? Or am I just not understanding where and how to look for the prices shown here?
Taking another look, not all of the prices are different though most are. And the difference is not necessarily a deal breaker, but $10 or $20 here and there can add up. Oh, and the link for the vid card for Newegg indicates that the card is "deactivated." Not sure what that means exactly, but I do know you can't buy it there now.
Experience: What you get when you don't get what you wanted
Keith E. Whisman
April 04, 2009 at 7:40pm
Newegg's prices fluctuate based on current market prices and rebates and discounts change and expire and new ones pop up. Sales come and go as well.
nekollx
April 04, 2009 at 8:35am
there a disclaimer right at the top
(All prices found on newegg.com, as of March 23rd, and do not include mail-in rebates, tax, or shipping)
and your complaingthat april 4 has different prices
skeptic
April 04, 2009 at 4:01pm
Actually, it is not a complaint. It is a recognition of the fact that the prices are no longer accurate, and I am asking for an update because of this.
Experience: What you get when you don't get what you wanted
skramblr
April 04, 2009 at 11:23am
I think the idea of using street pricing for the build was a great idea. But using a single 'lowest price' from 1 company on the internet seems unwise. As expected, just days after posting the parts are no longer available and you have to look $50 ti $100 higher for the video card (It seems Street pricing is really ~$500, not ~$400 if you google it).
da_samman
April 02, 2009 at 9:54am
There are a score of games out there (Baldur's Gate series, Icewind Dale Series, NWN) that may be considered legacy and may not even work on this OS of choice. And what about console emulators. I know from experience they don't work on the 32-bit version of Vista, so they sure as heck won't work on the 64-bit version either. Just ome food for thought.
Sincerely yours, from Fort Campbell, KY,
SGT Samuel E. McClard II
Life's a journey, enjoy the ride!!
nekollx
April 02, 2009 at 12:15pm
compatability mode
Seriously folks using Legacy Games as a excuse to not get Vista, your reaching. By that logic no one should by XP because some DOS games wont run in it.
Keith E. Whisman
March 31, 2009 at 11:02am
They choose the $100 NZXT Tempest for their case on page 2. They are using the OEM HSF that comes with the processor.
da_samman
March 25, 2009 at 9:50am
How can it be a gaming PC with NO SOUNDCARD?!?! In the $1000 budget rig they make room for a sound card. How can they not make room for a sound card, even the PCI soundblaster X-Fi?
Sincerely yours, from Fort Campbell, KY,
SGT Samuel E. McClard II
Life's a journey, enjoy the ride!!
Nightingale
March 30, 2009 at 7:31pm
Sound cards are all well and good, Sergeant, if your rig needs one. I've been using the integrated sound on my Asus P5N-D and it gives me way more fidelity and bass than I could ever need. The motherboards that they have on the market right now, including, I imagine, the Core i7 boards have fantasic audio support, which is why MaxPC didn't include it in this build. This has been a friendly tip from your neighborhood night bird, Nightingale.
Keith E. Whisman
March 30, 2009 at 10:12pm
I have the P5N-D in my main gaming system and the on board audio just plain sucks. Sure it works but the sound is crap compared to my Xfi Extreme Gamer PCI sound card.
What I hate about on board audio is noise and low Signal to noise ratio. I prefer my Xfi. If I had to go with integrated then I would choose a motherboard that offers a PCI or PCI Express break out card to keep the sound circuits off the motherboard and hence clean.
da_samman
March 25, 2009 at 9:50am
How can it be a gaming PC with NO SOUNDCARD?!?! In the $1000 budget rig they make room for a sound card. How can they not make room for a sound card, even the PCI soundblaster X-Fi?
Sincerely yours, from Fort Campbell, KY,
SGT Samuel E. McClard II
Life's a journey, enjoy the ride!!
Keith E. Whisman
March 24, 2009 at 5:14pm
In the article above for the PSU you state that "We don't review power supplies in the magazine," end quote.
I've been reading maximumPC since 1999-2000 and I've read dozens of reviews of power supply units in the magazine nothing recently but I recall a review of a bunch of them a few years back.
Is now a rule that MaximumPC no longer reviews PSU's?
bandeezee
March 24, 2009 at 12:14pm
I just received an e-mail from newegg with a deal on an Samsung DVD drive ($24.99), but it's the SH-S223Q. Is this an updated model from the SH-S223F that is listed here? Is this new model better? Wondering if you guys new anything about it and if the speeds should be improved. Perhaps it already has that patch included that speeds up the read capability of the drive (talked about in this month's magazine article)? Any input would be appreciated.
silentrob187
March 24, 2009 at 6:10pm
The difference is that Ver.Q includes the ability to burn light scribe while Ver.F does not have that ability.
bandeezee
March 25, 2009 at 10:07am
Anyone know if that patch for version F will work for version Q? I am in the process of a new build and with the patch the version F is super quick at reading DVD's, but wouldn't hurt to have lightscribe capability. I don't want to go for the newer version though if I can't patch it to the same speed as the F version though. If anybody knows or if anybody from MPC has tested the Q version, please let me know if you can patch the newer version and what the speeds are like.
stereo55
March 25, 2009 at 12:45pm
+ 1 on that .
Ive searched exstensivly about this and cant find an answer either .
The Amazing Asmasian
March 24, 2009 at 1:09am
$180 MSI 990FX-GD70 Mobo, $225 AMD PII 940 CPU, $90-70 Corsair XMS3 DDR3 PC3 10666 SDRAM, $310-280 Sapphire 4850X2 Video Card, $130-110 Corsair TX850W Power Supply, $140-110 Antec 900 Black Case, $100-90 Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB Hard Disc Drive, $24 Samsung SH-S223F Optical Drive (OK, now for some extras), $100 Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Sound Card, Creative Inspire T6100 5.1 Speakers, and $75 Zalman CNPS9900LED; with the $110 in rebates you could get the Vista Home Premium 64-bit Operating System all for under $1500.
The Amazing Asmasian
March 24, 2009 at 12:55pm
Well, I should have known when I posted this so late with classes to teach the next day that I might just have an error somewhere...ha ha ha...well it should say $225-215 AMD PII X4 940 CPU (OC this one). I understand that today's AMD CPU's do not compete with the I7's, but it was the best to fill the AM3 slot on the mobo and could use the DDR3 instead of the DDR2 RAM...and the 4870X2 would have been great but had to cut the budget somewhere...now can someone lend me the money to build this rig?
Bender2000
March 24, 2009 at 9:19am
The PII beats the Core2 CPU, but takes a beating by the Core i7, so why consider it? I wouldn't sacrifice the performance. I would try to get a sound card in there, though, but otherwise this is a solid build.
hentaiboi
March 23, 2009 at 11:27pm
nice core i7 build.
but again my personal changes to the list above:
asus ATI 4870X2 TOP
rampage 2 extreme
additional tri channel OCZ DDR 3 PC3-10666 7-7-7-20 1.6v 6GB =12GB
additional WD caviar black 1TB = RAID 0
MAXPCreader07
March 23, 2009 at 10:06pm
I wouldve gotten a smaller power supply (like a Corsair 750TX) and used the money for a better motherboard.
Keith E. Whisman
March 23, 2009 at 8:45pm
I agree there should be a stand alone sound card such as the Xfi Extreme Gamer as this motherboard is equiped with Realtek HD audio and that aint anything to brag about.
Keith E. Whisman
March 23, 2009 at 8:19pm
Well you would have gone a little over by about $100 bucks but you could have had 12gigs and the GTX295. I really like that 1000watt PSU but you could cut $100dollars from that by getting the Corsair 850W and that is power enough to run this rig with 2x GTX280 Video cards in SLI.
And the Seagate 1.5Tb HDD is around $120dollars so again this is a case of for just a few dollars more you can have that much more.
stige
March 24, 2009 at 7:00am
i agree on a slightly less powerful PSU to upgrade memory and add a sound card. it makes my skin itch to buy ATi in stead of nVidia (SLI upgrading be damned) but that card is pretty damn powerful so i can't knock it too much.
buying the Seagate would be foolish because of their reliability problems of late. i recall reading something in MPC that they were going to forego recommending Seagate (and using it) until they'd sorted their firmware issues and stopped borking hdd's.
i recall you saying, Keith, that you couldn't bear to put 'crap' in a computer so why would you want to use a Seagate vs the WD? that extra capacity is useless if you cant... well... USE it.
Keith E. Whisman
March 24, 2009 at 10:40am
I have two Seagate 7200.11 HDD's a new 1.5TB drive I bought two months ago and a 500gig drive I bought a year ago and both are running fast and strong. I have not had any problems with my drives and therefore will not bother the firmware. Seagate was having problems with a factory firmware series that was in the middle of the 7200.11 production cycle like 6months after the first 7200.11's hit the market and it lasted for like 4 or 5 months. People that didn't have any problems with their drives were flashing their firmware and bricking their drives because the firmware fix was buggy. But new drives and drives made at the beginning when the first 7200.11 drives first went to market had no problems.
What I'm trying to say is that if you go out and purchase a brand new Seagate 7200.11 drive right now it'll work great with the normal failure rate you can expect from hdd's that get killed in shipping.
Really I'm not going to hate on Seagate as they have fixed the firmware problems with the new drives. As for people that got bad drives because of buggy firmware don't spend your entire life hating on them because it happens to all the manufacturers at one time or another. Remember the Deskstar that wasn't even firmware that was the damn spindle bearing exploding that's what happened to mine anyway.
nmanguy
March 23, 2009 at 6:40pm
$1500 isn't really a "budget". I mean, you can build a PC for $500, albiet Core 2, and then throw in the 4870 X2 for another $400.
FRAGaLOT
March 23, 2009 at 10:59pm
then it wouldn't be a "gamers" rig for $500, unless you were upgrading an existing PC.
silentrob187
March 23, 2009 at 4:57pm
This is a much better round-up guide...but only for an Intel system. I do think that it would only be fair to also have an AMD system as well (which can be built much cheaper without sacrificing THAT much performance).
Speaking of, I wish that MPC would include a price-to-performance ratio in reviews, especially for "performance" hardware. In other words, like having a zero-point system that is used to compare performance of hardware, MPC sets a "zero point price-to performance" marker. That way readers could compare price/performance empirically. Or more concretely, whether or not paying $500 more for a system (or peice of hardware) that benchmarks 5% faster is really worth an extra $500 (e.g. $100 per percent performance increase), or conversely if NOT paying out $500 more results in a %25 decrease in performance had we bought it (or $20 per percent performance decrase).
Such an index would technically fit into Maximum PC's ultimate goal of finding peak perfomance and reporting on it since the price to performance ratio is sure to be curvilinear (i.e. their exists a floating "Maximum" price to performance integer for every set-up or peice of hardwar). Sure we could figure i out on our own but isn't that what we PAY our subscripts for(me 5 years in advance mind you)?!
The exact details of the index could be determined by the staff (they are geeks after all) and I am sure that the readers of the mag would appreciate it. Moreover, it is relevant to the economic times.
Just a thought...
skramblr
April 04, 2009 at 11:19am
Really? Spend the same $1500 to build a slower system? No thanks AMD Fanboy...
Cache
March 23, 2009 at 5:37pm
I was actually wondering how long it would take an AMD fanboi to raise hir head and beg to know why AMD may be a good bang for the buck, but why doesn't anyone consider it 'maximum'.
guoruiwu1994
March 23, 2009 at 4:42pm
why do we need a 1000 watt psu? a corsair 750 watt psu would be more than enough for that build.
sasquatch42
March 23, 2009 at 5:47pm
maybe we want to oc the h#ll out of the 920 and we might want those extra watts
nekollx
March 23, 2009 at 4:36pm
i still like COOLER MASTER RC-690-KKN1-GP Black SECC/ ABS ATX Mid Tower Computer Case
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811119137 for a case
and you save another 20 bucks!
Captain
March 23, 2009 at 4:28pm
I thought you included the cpu cooler in the price, and if you did, it would still be under 1500$ if you use the zalman 9900.
MAXPCreader07
March 23, 2009 at 10:10pm
Or go for the Xigmatek Thors Hammer. Much better cooling than Zalman.
norman
March 23, 2009 at 4:32pm
the zalman 9900 is priced at $75 on newegg right now (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835118046) so the price would go over 1500 if you don't count rebates (which we don't, since those are time-sensitive). The cooler that comes with the core i7 retail box is actually very good at its job, even if you plan to do a little overclocking. for the record though, i run a 9900 at home and it's really superb.
-- Norm
nekollx
March 24, 2009 at 3:33pm
how much power does this rig really use, wont 650 wats be more then enough? wit ha smaller PSU and the case i recomented thats a good couple hundred extra to thorew into i dunno a second vid card *shrugs*
Keith E. Whisman
March 24, 2009 at 5:08pm
Well the 650 would be at it's limits and unless it's an extremely high quality one it wont last more than a year perhaps if it survives the summer months even in a home with AC. The hotter a PSU gets the less efficient it is and the less demand it can handle. So I Wouldn't use anything less than a quality 800watt plus PSU. I used to buy PSU's by the math and get something with about a 200watt buffer but in the summer heat here in Arizona the air gets really thin and dry and even with airconditioning it get's really hot in my computer case and I've had a bunch of Power supplies die the bang of capacitor death.
You see when it gets hot inside the PSU it's ability to meet power demands gets lower and lower until the system sucks more juice from the capacitors than they can fill and some how or other the capacitors go bang and then the computers monitor goes blank.
So don't get just the minimum. Get a really good reliable power supply from a really good manufacturer that uses great quality parts and offers alot of great features and get a PSU with alot more than just a 200watt buffer over demand. Get alot more.
The only reason why I suggested the 850W Corsair is because it's a really good PSU from a great manufacturer and it has great features and it appears to offer the bare minimum Wattage for contemporary gaming machines like this one. Actually the 1000watt PSU that is being used is perfect but because the 850 is a hundred bucks cheaper I'd get it so I could get more ram and a larger HDD.
