Dell Dubs iPad Too Expensive for Enterprise Using Fuzzy Math
It doesn't appear Apple is having any trouble moving iPad tablets. The recently released iPad 2 sold out almost as soon as it went on sale, and there's now a waiting period if you place an order with Apple. Be that as it may, a senior Dell executive says the iPad has no place in the enterprise because of its high price, at least when you toss in the necessary peripherals, and that Android will lead eventually lead the way.
"Apple is great if you've got a lot of money and live on an island. It's not so great if you have to exist in a diverse, open, connected enterprise, simple things become quite complex," Andy Lark, Dell's global head of marketing for large enterprises and public organizations, said to CIO Australia.
Of course, Dell has a vested interest in seeing alternative tablets succeed, as the OEM is currently building slates based on Android and Windows Phone 7. But does Lark have a point?
"An iPad with a keyboard, mouse, and a case [means] you'll be at $1,500 or $1,600; that's double of what you're paying. That's not feasible," Lark says.
And we would agree, $1,600 for a tablet isn't feasible, the problem is his numbers don't exactly add up. The most expensive iPad 2 device runs $829. Even after adding the cost of a keyboard and case, you're still under $1,000, and that's for the most expensive iPad out there. For the least expensive model, you can shave $330 off.
Comments
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
ShyLinuxGuy
March 30, 2011 at 12:22pm
I don't like Dell too much, but Dell's right on this one!
They're probably factoring in warranties, training for the IT department, etc. that would be tacked on to the costs of these electronic dishes. Yep, they get broken, and a Windows-coordinated IT department won't know much, or maybe anything at all about how to deploy and administer the iPad. Warranties and training don't come free.
What use does an iPad have in an enterprise? We have PC tablets for this purpose. My other sis is a 2nd year RN, and they're using PC tablets (Fujitsu, I think). iPads are for 10 year olds, really.
![]()
FrancesTheMute
March 30, 2011 at 12:57pm
" Yep, they get broken, and a Windows-coordinated IT department won't know much, or maybe anything at all about how to deploy and administer the iPad. Warranties and training don't come free."
That same argument would hold true for Android tablets, as well. In the article the guy from Dell was saying Android was going to lead the way in Enterprise use.
![]()
ChyITGuru
March 30, 2011 at 7:45am
I agree with jwangyue, if you needed all that you would use a laptop. Now as far as android leading the way, if it runs as good on a tablet as it did on the 5 different phones i had Android will never make it, as far as I'm concerned Android is the biggest pile of crap, nothing but problems with every Android phone I ever had, my friends even have a boat load of problems.
![]()
jwangyue
March 30, 2011 at 6:29am
If you need a mouse, keyboard, and a case, you wouldn't be using a tablet, period. You would be using a laptop.
In Situations where you do use a tablet, Apple is still one of the best. Especially with its IPS screen where you can have a very wide view angle.
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.

















