De-Anonymizing Wikipedia

De-Anonymizing Wikipedia

A new website (down at the moment after getting linked by nearly every high-profile blog there is) identifies the source of anonymous Wikipedia edits coming from governmental agencies, political parties, and corporations. Wikipedia Scanner correlates the edits' IP addresses with the blocks of IP addresses known to be owned by those organizations, and presents that information as a publicly-accessible database. When it gets back on its feet, that is.

Users have uncovered a number of self-interested changes. Someone at Diebold erased a swath of critical information about disputed elections and the Diebold CEO's fundraising from the Diebold entry. The edit was quickly reverted by another user, however, who admonished the vandalism. The FBI removed aerial photographs of Guantanamo Bay. The MPAA massaged the entry on DRM. Edits trace back to the Republican and Democratic parties, as well.

No matter what the search engines say, IP addresses are personally-identifying information.

More and more judges have been relying on Wikipedia in their opinions, and this should give them pause; you just can't trust the accuracy of something so mutable. Sure, the definition of “firewire”[pdf] probably won't be too controversial, but once you get in the habit of treating Wikipedia as authority, it'll be hard to stop. A friend of mine discovered this when she went to Wikipedia looking for a source for a brief she was writing. The article didn't cover what she wanted to rely on it to say – so she edited the page. (Needless to say, she didn't cite to Wikipedia after that).

4

Comments

+ Add a Comment
avatar

Mayhemm

You find me a so-called "authentic" encyclopedia that has a complete write-up on Dragonball Z and I'll pay $70/year, but not before! ; )

avatar

TheMurph

*coughs*

http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/f.php?ip1=204.253.162.0-255

avatar

SpazzAttack

Wikipeda has always been a joke. It cannot be trusted even with non-controversial topics. God help me if I ever have to stand before a judge that uses Wikipeda as a reference for his decision. That's an automatic grounds for appeal, if you ask me!

For $70 a year, you can access a real encyclopedia written by authors who sign their names to their work and usually know what they are talking about. Or better yet, crack open a book.

avatar

n0b0dykn0ws

"Oh my glory!"

Not too terribly shocking. I think this kind of says it all though:

http://tinyurl.com/35qohb

n0b0dykn0ws

Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook

Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.

Login with Facebook
Log in using Facebook to share comments and articles easily with your Facebook feed.