CrossFire and SLI Performance Fix for Vista, Part Deux
Back in July, Microsoft rolled out a fix for a nasty bug in its Windows Vista SLI and CrossFire multi-GPU support: Windows Vista was using only one of the GPUs! However, the Inquirer.net website reported yesterday that a more subtle bug is still plaguing some multi-GPU setups: a problem with load-balancing between GPUs.
Load-Balancing Woes and System Slowdowns
If one of the GPUs in your system is very busy, and and other idle GPUs receive a new DMA packet, you may experience scheduling latency. In plain language, your system slows down until all GPUs are assigned work to do. If you like to juggle games and other applications at the same time on your SLI or CrossFire system, you're a prime candidate for this type of slowdown.
Meet LDA, a Way to Avoid Saying "SLI" or "CrossFire"
This update isn't going to show up in Windows Update, at least not for awhile. And, if you ran into it during a casual scan of recent downloads, you might not even recognize it. That's because Microsoft is now referring to multi-GPU configurations as Linked Display Adapter (LDA) setups. SLI and CrossFire fans, make a note of this: every time you see a reference to LDA at Microsoft, think SLI (nVIDIA) or CrossFire (ATI/AMD).
Learning More About the Update...and Getting It
Microsoft has information about the hotfix, available for both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows Vista, at Knowledge Base article 945149. You must request the hotfix from Microsoft, rather than download it directly from the KB article. Microsoft promises a download link within 8 business hours, as we discussed in our article Hotfixes by Email - Just What the Windows Doctor Ordered.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help Windows Vista newbies learn how to use BitLocker to stop data theft, get organized with Windows Calendar, and back up data and systems the easy way: give Mark's new book Maximum PC Microsoft Windows Vista Exposed. It's now available at Amazon.com and other fine bookstores.
Comment
Comments are closed on this article
![]()
hogkill
December 05, 2007 at 3:10pm
Why can't microsoft just give up on Vista? I really think they would stand to benefit from continuing to support XP as their main OS. They should add directX10 support and continued SP releases until their next OS.
There's no point forcing ourselves to look at the brighter aspects of vista. I don't think the aero design is good at all, it has no real benefits over the standard windows GUI and is a complete system hog. If i wanted something stupid like that I would go out and buy a mac. Now Microsoft is losing customers to Macintosh because of their failed attempt to be like them.
On my new laptop that came loaded with Vista i start off with a whole gig of ram from a fresh boot. I know vista can run on less than this ammount and it's just taking advantage of the space for benefits in performance but it's still just way too much.
It's a downgrade from xp. It's absolute garbage. Why does microsoft have to keep forcing this system out of the gate. People would still be buying just as many (or more) computers loaded with xp if they hadnt even bothered to launch this tub of lard OS.
Should anyone have to deal with these fixes when we already have a perfectly functional (and better) OS with xp. No we shouldn't.
Just give me dx10 for xp plz. I dont want to have to bog down my next gaming rig with vista.
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.

















