Texas Messes with Innovation

[Ed note: This edition of Byte Rights was originally published in our Holiday 2008 issue.]
Since childhood, I’ve bitterly wondered why I don’t have a jet car, or my own robot assistant and constant companion. I would call it Sally, and Sally would keep me organized and help me fight crime at night.
Part of the reason my future has failed me is abuse of the patent system, the part of IP that protects and fosters technological innovation. You can’t copyright an idea, but patents give you a limited time to develop and grow an idea yourself. However, the patent system hasn’t changed much in 300 years, leaving it flawed and exploitable. Nobody exploits the system better than patent trolls.
Trolls don’t make things, they don’t create jobs, they just buy up patents (often at bankruptcy auctions) and look for targets to sue, usually filing the suit in Texas.
Now I have to mess with Texas here, or at least a little place I like to call the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas, located in the small town of Marshall.
Marshall is traditional and has a profound and unsubtle respect for property rights. Marshallites seem to take a “Trespassers will be shot” approach to intellectual property, making it patent troll heaven.
It’s even got a curmudgeonly old judge with no time for nonsense like comprehensive documentation or detailed oral arguments. Judge T. Ward confesses that his court is “plaintiff friendly”—drawing lawsuit filings from everywhere. The court tends to deny all motions to move cases elsewhere, making Marshall a sucking bog of litigation. Cases rarely reach trial. Defendants see the odds, do the math, and settle. In an age when tech is losing jobs and resources, it’s depressing.
But there’s a glimmer of hope. In a recent case concerning a Michigan company and an Ohio company, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that Judge Ward and Texas had no business with the case and moved it to Ohio. This is the second time such a ruling has been made, and it’s beginning to look like cases might get out of Marshall and into more fair venues. You hear that technologists? I’ll have my jet car in red and my robot programmed with crime-fighting ninjutsu.
Quinn Norton writes about copyright for Wired News and other publications. Her work has ranged from legal journalism to the inner life of pirate organizations.
![]()
Scapegoat
January 29, 2009 at 6:24pm
I happened to really enjoy this article, thanks for bringing up an issue that has failed to have been talked about, and one that has been brewing in my mind recently, in the form of some previously unanswered questions. Thanks again!
![]()
zeringue
January 29, 2009 at 5:56pm
Quinn, Why are you here? I have yet to feel I haven't wasted my time reading your articles.
![]()
dc10ten
January 29, 2009 at 9:13pm
apparently you weren't paying attention when they put her in for legal stuff concerning technology. If you don't think patent trolls have anything to do with technology, then you are simply blind to it.
although rambus did create some technology, they are the first that come to mind.
![]()
crc32
January 29, 2009 at 7:22pm
Good article Quinn, and your purpose here is certainly more clear then that of the person above me.
![]()
MyMojo
January 29, 2009 at 7:51pm
I agree! I think her articles are well suited for MaximumPC. Helps keep me up-to-date on the topics that are rarely talked about on tech sites. Keep up the good work Quinn!
If humans evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys?
![]()
tri8gman
January 30, 2009 at 9:55am
I hope your signature is sarcastic. Have you read anything at all on the subject of evolution?
It's like saying there can be only one type of bird, one type of cat, one type of dog... Sorry, I just hate the question for having such an obvious answer (and not the one it intends to show).
On a more relevant note, IP Law really is in need of a serious update - especially considering how negatively it is affecting everything (YouTube muting fan-made videos anyone?).














