Future Tense: The Internet Is Made Of Acid
Some people think that science fiction writers predict the future.
No, we don’t.
We warn against it.
Badly.
It doesn’t take a lot of smarts to predict a technological advance. Most are evolutionary. It’s easy to predict more powerful this and faster that. The research is already going on in the labs. It’s a little bit harder to predict a technological breakthrough—that’s revolutionary, not evolutionary. The internal combustion engine, cars, airplanes, radio, television, transistors, integated circuits, lasers—all of those are revolutionary technologies.
But the almost-impossible thing to predict is the transformative effect of both evolutionary and revolutionary advances in tech. It’s not that hard to predict the growth of computer technology, science fiction writers did it routinely in the golden age stories of the fifties. What was beyond the event-horizon of the time was the shift in human thinking that would occur when computers are incorporated into the common environment.
Robert A. Heinlein predicted the Internet in For Us, The Living, a novel he wrote in 1938, but not published until 2003. In that book, the heroine is shown using a global communications network for shopping and phone calls, as well as for rehearsing a dance performance which will eventually have music and visuals added and sold to viewers worldwide.
Murray Leinster wrote A Logic Named Joe, which was even more prescient. That story, first published in the March 1946 issue of Astounding Science Fiction, predicted personal computers called ‘logics,’ all connected to a world wide web of servers that could provide access to all human information. The drawback of the system was that when the system (the ‘Joe’ of the title) starts to develop sentience, it disables its own filtering and starts handing out information on how to make psychelics, how to commit the perfect murder, and sexual content to anyone who asks for it, regardless of age. Hm.
John Brunner published The Shockwave Rider in 1975. The hero was a computer hacker who wrote and released worms into the global network to protect himself from various government agents. Brunner is generally credited with creating the term ‘worm’ as a descriptor of a specific kind of malware. (The concept of the ‘computer virus’ was first demonstrated in my own 1972 novel, When Harlie Was One, for which I remain profoundly sorry.)
Prior to the Internet, we had Usenet and BBS systems like FIDO-net and for-pay systems like CompuServe and AOL. At its prime, CompuServe had more than eight million subscribers and was the single best online information resource a computer user could tap into. CompuServe had email and chat rooms and large libraries of files in every forum. But it was the forums that were the major attraction (and cash cow). The Sci-Fi forum was populated with many writers and artists, the Consumer Electronics Forum had technical experts from major companies and magazines, the Aviation Forum was filled with amateur and professional pilots and engineers, the Turbo Pascal Forum was run by Borland employees—and the Political Issues forum was filled with amateurs and Libertarians. (I’ll explain that joke another time.)
By the mid-eighties, it was already evident that an unfettered global communications network would rapidly create a tectonic shift in human interactions. SF fans were one of the first communities to network themselves. Example: rumors about the production of Star Trek: The Next Generation were a particular nuisance for several of the show’s producers who weren’t quite ready for the future. Fan-boys who wanted to show how much they were in-the-know would leak daily rumors and speculations to CompuServe and AOL and various other BBS systems. (And a lot of it was ugly gossip specifically intended to damage the reputations of people who had been designated as enemies of the show.)
Not attracting as much attention, but far more important, was the ever increasing dissemination of copyrighted materials through Usenet. One of the first authors to take arms against this rising tide was Harlan Ellison, who successfully sued AOL because even after they were informed, they continued to provide access to his copyrighted materials. Too many observers saw this lawsuit as just another tantrum by SF’s perennial bad-boy. Too bad. They missed the real significance of the event.
By the mid-nineties, the Internet had finally finished pupating. It shed its ARPANET skin, stretched itself in the sun, patiently dried out its wings, and took its first tentative flight.
No, Al Gore did not invent the Internet. And he never said he did. What he actually did was push through several important pieces of legislation to create competitive markets in all communications sectors. The 1996 Telecommunications Act and new regulations for the FCC made the Internet possible as we know it today—that is, one of the single most subversive forces on the planet.
Remember that thing from chaos theory? The butterfly effect? The butterfly flaps its wings in Tokyo and ultimately triggers a tornado in California?
Right. Welcome to the eye of the tornado.
CompuServe was one of the first victims of the Internet. But that was obvious. Who needed to pay for a monthly subscription to CompuServe or AOL when the Internet was essentially free? When AOL bought CompuServe, it wasn’t for the user-base, it was for the network, the in-place hardware. What was lost, unfortunately, were the communities of experts.
Along about the same time, Mom-and-Pop bookstores began to disappear, unable to survive the Amazon juggernaut. Specialty bookstores like Dangerous Visions and Scene Of The Crime lost too much income to the convenience of online sales.
Music outlets began to vanish too. Remember Wherehouse, Sam Goody, Tower Records, Virgin? All gone. Video stores too. Today, CDs and DVDs are mostly found in bookstores and electronics stores and warehouse stores like Target and Costco and Wal-Mart. The independent stores are gone.
Do you still buy CD’s? Or do you download music from iTunes and Amazon and Zune marketplace?
Do you rent DVD’s? Do you go to Blockbuster or do you get them sent to you from Netflix? Or do you stream movies from Netflix and TV shows from Hulu?
Have you been to a newsstand lately? A lot of familiar magazines have disappeared, abandoning their newsstand distribution in favor of their online presence. Starlog is gone. PC-Magazine is gone. (And have you noticed how thin Wired has gotten lately? The advertising dollars are going elsewhere.) A whole bunch of fashion magazines have disappeared too, and that suggests that the female demographic is also shifting their attention away from magazines and to the web.
An accountant I know, who used to manage the books for an adult-film company, says that the porn industry is hurting too. Why buy DVD’s when you can download? And why pay for downloads when there are so many amateurs and free sites? (I’ll have to take his word for it.)
Do you still buy books? Or do you download them to your Kindle or your iPad or your Nook? Maybe not yet, but you will. It’s inevitable.
Do you subscribe to a newspaper? Probably not. Newspapers and other news outlets are hurting badly too. Why read a newspaper when you can get an aggregate of news content from all over the world at news.google.com? You can also go to The Nation, The Economist, Time, Newsweek, Salon, Slate, Huffingtonpost. and others for aggregates of commentary and opinion. And if all you want are the daily comics…well, iGoogle has a gadget that will let you create your own comic page with most of the best comics represented. Do you need to check the movie listings? Go to Google and type ‘movies <your zipcode>.’ So why buy a newspaper? (For me, it’s the full page ad from Fry’s Electronics on the back page of the sports section, but that’s only an occasional pleasure.)
The Internet is fifteen years old. It’s a teenager. Whatever it touches, it eats. When it reaches adulthood, it will be the Blob. It will roll over its victims, surrounding and absorbing and devouring everything. It will be the universal solvent.
Whatever information technology exists today or gets invented tomorrow, the Internet will become its primary method of transmission, making all other forms of access ancillary, or simply irrelevant.
We have already seen the beginnings of the cultural transformation that the Internet represents. But what we have seen in the fifteen years since it began is still only the warmup.
David Gerrold is a Hugo and Nebula award-winning author. He has written more than 50 books, including "The Man Who Folded Himself" and "When HARLIE Was One," as well as hundreds of short stories and articles. His autobiographical story "The Martian Child" was the basis of the 2007 movie starring John Cusack and Amanda Peet. He has also written for television, including episodes of Star Trek, Babylon 5, Twilight Zone, and Land Of The Lost. He is best known for creating tribbles, sleestaks, and Chtorrans. In his spare time, he redesigns his website, www.gerrold.com
![]()
Jims45wow
May 02, 2010 at 4:03pm
We can learn from historical example, such as David's inclusion of the Automobile, that interested holders of somewhat related resources, often combine to (help) create a societal demand for markets. (i.e. cars, fuel, highways, etc.) These then become "our way of life". I THINK we should each be trying to make the internet useful for how we would really want it in our future way of life.
Thanks, Mr. Gerrold. (But, I have to tell you, I saw the clip of Algore saying it--We'll each have to judge what he meant to convey, and why.)
Were you poking at libertarians? How come? Many of them just want pot legalized, but most of them are merely trying to find the real "Liberal" banner that vanished in place of the "progressive" one. (Yes, I need the joke explained to me.)
Jim
Now, let's try the Spam Block ag-ain! (to the tune of "Time-Warp", it makes being refused more fun...)
![]()
JohnP
April 30, 2010 at 6:07pm
The internet is just at the beginning of the changes that it will incur. I cannot see what things will be like in 20 years, I just can't fathom it.
In my life, I went from having an office to go to everyday for 15 years, to occasionally for 5 and then only at home for the last 5 years with the nearest office 600 miles away (then laid off). Did I ever imagine this when I started work? No way.
GPS is still magic to me. I hiked and bicycled a lot when I was younger. I got seriously lost in the woods (bad weather mostly) more than once. GPS would have been a life saving genie, for $100 at eh nearest store.
Real time news? TV was the first but now TV is for talking heads and better cameras.
The huge waste of large buildings, large warships, large spaceships will be gone in 20 years.
I just cannot imagine...
![]()
Zazubovich
April 30, 2010 at 3:05pm
I just bought a bunch of classic reprints of old sci-fi at Value Village for peanuts: Sturgeon, Asimov, P.K. Dick, short story anthologies. A lot of super sweet stuff is just floating out there because people are fixated on cruddy digital media delivery systems that force feed garbage to users. Itunes, realplayer, whoever it is shunt you to a front page with a bunch of gaga this and aguilera that and nicklecreed kornosaurus the other, up front so you can't avoid it. Plus Kindle and 1984 was so bad it brought irony back.
For tunes I buy from places like Yep Roc Records, where you can pick up great stuff in several media formats at the same time. Los Straitjackets on DVD with immediate digital download of the tracks? Soundtrack of our Lives on vinyl with immediate digital download plus bonus tracks? Yay! Why do the major labels try and Fuxor you by buying the dvd and the audio separately and cry when people rip the DVD tracks? Pixies, hello?
![]()
scott tech
April 30, 2010 at 10:29am
Thanks a lot reading this post and thinking about the beginnings of the internet made me think about those early days. I remember the usernet etc. and now I feel old. lol but thanks it was an interesting read.
Never stop striving
![]()
persondude
April 30, 2010 at 8:40am
The internet is really a series of tubes!
But I do understand the whole thing about how the internet caused technological innovations to increase exponentially and make it hard to predict or even follow them. Being young and in the IT field, I still find it hard keep up with a crap load anything that happens as far as advances in both software and hardware are concerned.
![]()
Alex Krislov
April 30, 2010 at 6:00am
Good overview of the roller coaster ride we shared. One item you didn't really touch on, though, was the speed of change. Throughout the eighties, change seemed slow. Those of us who were online already confidently predicted huge changes, universal usage, the permeation of the culture. We did it in comfort and staid regularlity. Sure, we knew our predictions would come true -- eventually.
When the web was born, the process sped up exponentially. It happened fast. All of us old farts suddenly discovered we were old farts, not the young turks we still saw in our mirrors. Yesterday's prognosticators were the new whiners. "What about offline readers?" "Aw, it's just an etch-a-sketch on amphetamines!"
Tomorrow's changes are going to come faster than we thought. Much faster. I love books, but the Kindle and its brethren are going to take over sooner, rather than later. Newspapers won't last out the next decade.
I'm just hoping to stay along for the ride, rather than being run over by it.
![]()
Tenhawk
April 29, 2010 at 5:27pm
Irony : Making a statement like We don't predict the future, we warn against it... badly... Then proceeding to warn against it, most likely badly.
Calling the internet the Blob is a bit of a misnomer, since the titular 'character' of that film was an insatiable beast that absorbed everything it could merely so it could grow larger. The internet, however, while indeed absorbing everything it can isn't keeping the wealth to itself. As markets adjust and adapt, a lot of potential money is being made from people who stopped buying paper books in favor of Kindle, who stopped buying CD's in favor of iTunes, and who are now looking to various services for their movies instead of the horrible format called DVD, which was the worst video format ever... except for all the others.
So can you really say that the internet is the blob? It's not absorbing anything. it's CHANGING *everything*.
I think I would prefer to liken it to the legendary Philosopher's Stone, the ultimate goal of Alchemists.
Of course, no Alchemist worth his saltpeter would ever leave the stone lying around for the entire world to use... so maybe the blob analogy has some value as well. heh
![]()
Havok
April 30, 2010 at 6:05am
Did you just bring this all back to Full Metal Alchemist and then not explain your analogy? Could you please explain for the other kids in the class that don't know about FMA? Personally, I like the blob analogy better, I actually took it more as the Blob from Marvel; insatiable hunger and an ever growing size through the ages.
YES! This post made it through the Spam Filter!
![]()
Tenhawk
April 30, 2010 at 10:22am
Full Metal Alchemist?
Dude, you need to watch more than Anime. lol
The Philosopher's Stone is an old legend, it wasn't invented by JK Rowling or whoever wrote FMA. And the analogy is simply that, like alchemy, computers are about changing how we do things... and the internet is, so far, the ultimate expression of computers... much like the Philosopher's Stone is the ultimate expression of Alchemy.
![]()
lostcause64
April 30, 2010 at 4:54am
...He may be right with the Blob analogy when you figure all of the lives and relationships that have been "devoured" by the Internet courtesy of endless hours of surfing and gaming. If more and more of our lives are "forced" to using the Internet for nearly everything we are interested in, be it entertainment or work, we are being absorbed so the Blob can grow larger.
John
Have you ever wondered why intelligence can normally be found in an individual, but runs screaming in terror from a group? Though, there are exceptions...
![]()
Tenhawk
April 30, 2010 at 10:25am
Yes and no. Actually I've seen the flip side of that equation just as much... more, actually, since I don't deal with hard core gamers much. Several marriages in my area began on the net, many people I know maintain their relationships through facebook, and so on. So, again, it's not so much devouring as *changing*. Those who refuse to adapt, well... they get devoured. As a race, however, I think we often underestimate not only how well we CAN adapt, but how well we already HAVE adapted.
We have a tendency to look at the big picture, take it all in, and then ignore it in favor of the tiny section of it that happens to be on fire...
![]()
lostcause64
April 30, 2010 at 10:37am
We have a tendency to look at the big picture, take it all in, and then
ignore it in favor of the tiny section of it that happens to be on
fire..I love that comment!
John
Have you ever wondered why intelligence can normally be found in an individual, but runs screaming in terror from a group? Though, there are exceptions...















