Buffalo TeraStation Live

avatar

Buffalo TeraStation Live

Our little hearts were ablaze with excitement when we busted open the chunky Buffalo TeraStation Live. And with good reason; on paper, the four-drive NAS device looked like it was going to be an easy winner–its two terabytes of total storage in a RAID-5 configuration made us smile.

As it turns out, we celebrated prematurely. The Buffalo TeraStation Live performs about as well in a file transfer test as it would in a foot race. Surprisingly, it was the only NAS device of the four tested here that had slower read times than write times. At 5:16 (min:sec) to transfer a 3GB file from the NAS to a PC, you’ll be in for a bit of a wait should you decide to use this device as a media hub–you might as well put in a vacation notice at work if you’re copying two terabytes’ worth of data.

Write speeds were marginally better but still not fast enough to catapult the TeraStation Live to the front of the file-transfer footrace. That said, the TeraStation Live offsets the pain by packing a few neat features into this otherwise plain-Jane device. We love the device’s user-management settings—a handy web interface makes it easy to add new users, assign users to groups, and control file-access operations.

Also handy is the TeraStation Live’s built-in media server feature. We were able to pull up a shared batch of MP3s on iTunes with no problems whatsoever. But this rounds out the feature list for this NAS device. Nothing distances Buffalo’s NAS box from its competitors in terms of features, which forces us to rely on its slow transfer speeds for an overall verdict. We’d recommend the TeraStation Live for its data redundancy and ease-of-use, but like this device, we simply run out of steam for further praise.

Scrabulous

The installer slaps a shortcut to the TeraStation Live right on your desktop.

Literati

Slow data-transfer speeds; the price ($1,300!) gives us a heart attack.

7

BENCHMARKS
Read
Buffalo Terastation LiveQNAP TS-109 Pro
Small 1:20
0:36
Large 5:16
2:27
Write
 Write test
Small 1:05
0:39
Large 3:50
2:44
We used the CD contents of Maximum PC’s November 2007 CD for the “small” file testing, and a single 3GB file for the “large” testing. All scores were averages of three transfer trials. Scores for the QNAP TS-109 enclosure were obtained using a provided 750GB Seagate 7200.10 Barracuda drive.
2

Comments

+ Add a Comment
avatar

suhaojung

You should have a look at QNAP's latest NAS TS-409. It contain all the features from TS-109 but enhanced more security in each section with the latest firmware 2.0. It's 4 terabytes avaliable with RAID 5/6. Check QNAP's forum and you will find more about what QNAP's NAS can do. http://forum.qnap.com

avatar

MadOTC

I was considering buying one of these boxes but after reading this review and hearing about the slow transfer speed I am reconsidering. Does anyone have a recommendation for a better stand alone NAS device available now? I need something with at least 2 TB of storage to store a large amount of video. i would like to just slap an array onto an existing server but these will hold sensitive data which can't be connected to our office network.

Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook

Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.

Login with Facebook
Log in using Facebook to share comments and articles easily with your Facebook feed.