Asus EAH 3870
AMD has pulled a rabbit out of its hat by transforming the near-debacle that was the R600 architecture into a serious mainstream contender: The Radeon HD 3870.
The new GPU delivers several important features left out of AMD’s previous best effort: the Radeon HD 2900 XT. The most important of these is the inclusion of AMD’s Unified Video Decoder, which offloads all high-definition video decoding chores from the host CPU. The new part supports HDCP on both DVI links, too, so Blu-ray and HD DVD movies can be displayed at the native resolution of a 30-inch panel. There’s also support for new technologies such as PCI Express 2.0, DirectX 10.1, and Shader Model 4.1, although it remains to be seen how important these features will be in the near future. (Nvidia’s new 8800 GT is also PCI Express 2.0 compliant, but it doesn’t support DirectX 10.1.)
Asus’s EAH3870 is the first retail board we’ve examined that uses the 3870 part, and we’re impressed: It’s been a while since we’ve been able to laud anything other than an Nvidia-based videocard with a Kick Ass award. This card is not only powerful, it’s also affordably priced at $260 (and includes the first-rate game Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts).
AMD promises we’ll see other cards based on this GPU selling for $220, but those will likely come with reference-design clocks. In this case, Asus bumped the 3870’s core clock speed to 851MHz and the card’s 512MB of GDDR4 memory to 1.143GHz (from AMD’s reference-design speeds of 775MHz and 1.125GHz, respectively). Asus had just begun shipping these cards and was able to provide us with only one, so check MaximumPC.com for an updated review with CrossFire numbers.
Great job, AMD! Now get back into the lab and build a new GPU that can compete at the high end of the market.
Aces
Unified Video Decoder; PCI Express 2.0, DirectX 10.1, and Shader Model 4.1support; affordable. AMD's first card in a while that can compete with Nvidia.
Deuces
Not as fast as the 8800 GT in DirectX 9.
9
| Windows XP (DirectX 9) | |||
| EVGA E-GeForce 8800 GT SSC | ASUS EAH3870 (Radeon HD 3870) | ||
| 3DMark06 Game 1 (FPS) | 30.0 | 24.6 | |
| 3DMark06 Game 2 (FPS) | 22.9 | 21.3 | |
| World in Conflict (FPS) | 32.0 | 22.0 | |
| Lost Planet (FPS) | 34.3 | 23.4 | |
| Windows Vista (DirectX 10) | |||
| EVGA E-GeForce 8800 GT SSC | ASUS EAH3870 (Radeon HD 3870) | ||
| 3DMark06 Game 1 (FPS) | 28.0 | 24.0 | |
| 3DMark06 Game 2 (FPS) | 22.3 | 21.3 | |
| World in Conflict (FPS) | 20.0 | 23.0 | |
| Lost Planet (FPS) | 22.0 | 24.2 | |
| Best single-GPU score bolded. AMD-based cards tested with an Intel D975BX2 motherboard; Nvidia-based cards tested with an EVGA 680i SLI motherboard. Intel 2.93GHz Core 2 Extreme X6800 CPUs and 2GB of Corsair DDR RAM used in both scenarios. Benchmarks performed at 1920x1200 resolution on ViewSonic VP2330wb monitors. | |||
Comments
![]()
cozmodan
January 02, 2008 at 9:15am
Good job guys on the review. You said that you would be posting the test results of the card in crossfire mode, but it is not here that I can see. Will you have a link here when it is done?
Thanks,
Coz
![]()
greds04
December 31, 2007 at 12:31pm
The reason he probably didn't use the Beta drivers as I have heard plenty of times before is due to the fact that they are not finished and can be unstable.
I'm having a hard time choosing between this card and the EVGA 8800GT for my build in March, yes I know the 8800 is a slightly faster, but as the review said "the 8800 is not DX10.1 compatible"!
and then the price, for $100 dollars less ($50 at the least) I can buy a card that is only 2-7 frames a second slower than a model of card that has been floating around on the market for the last year or a little bit more (that in my opinion should be at the exact same price if not being turned into a budget card sometime soon).
The only other problem I have is the driver support, ATI used to be constantly throwing new drivers and updates to the public...since the AMD takeover I'm kind of unsure what is happening with them now, hopefully they will catch up again and get back to normal, but they need to really get moving again as I'm sure Nvidia has the next series rolling out soon and it's taken ATI a year to get close to the latest version of the (getting old) 8800.
at the moment I'm tempted to buy an ATI regardless of the insignificant FPS difference, and a price I would pay twice for the dual card features unlike the competitors cards where it feels like your being ripped off somewhere for the cost...especially when the entry level 8800 512MB card is so overpriced compared to the ATI 3870.
![]()
JCCIII
December 14, 2007 at 11:14pm
Dear AMD/ATI,
Your 2900 XT was probably a thin lifeline, and now you are starting to produce what has long been ATI's goal, efficiency, performance, and intelligence, (Do not let us down with driver issues). I am seriously considering building scalable systems with your new GPU technology. Hopefully, I will be able to find within the next month or so a well-implemented motherboard with current technology. DDR3, PCIe 2.0, (3 lanes x16 2.0), with a few available PCI slots.
Have an excellent holiday to everyone.
~Joseph
![]()
Ninjawithagun
December 14, 2007 at 10:48pm
uh...Michael, you might want to fix the title of this article to read "ASUS EAH 3870" and not 2870 ;)
Seriously though, great article. But please make sure to point out that the drivers used for benching the 8800GT are already outdated. New beta drivers were released just a couple days ago. You did not state which drivers you used for the benchmarks. I'm assuming the nVidia drivers used are the "old" 169.02 WHQL drivers that were released waaaaaayyyyyy back on 31 October (hint, hint).
Also, the 8800GT actually beats out the EAH 3870 in both World in Conflict and Lost Planet at 1920 x 1200 resolution once AA and AF are enabled through the in-game graphics settings. Word to the wise, if you want to enjoy all the eye candy with the additional filters turned on, the eVGA SSC 8800GT beats the EAH 3870 easily.
Log in to MaximumPC directly or log in using Facebook
Forgot your username or password?
Click here for help.















