Albatron's PCI 8-Series Videocards Hit a Snag
Have you ever run into an old ex-girlfriend only to realize she's nothing the way you remembered? Or fired up that retro-game and wondered what you found so appealing about it in the first place? Every once in awhile a blast from the past (like bringing WarGames back to theaters) will make a worthwhile comeback, but more often than not, old relics are best left buried, and Albatron might be finding this out.
Earlier this month the company let it be known it would be bringing Nvidia's 8-series videocards in 8400, 8500, and 8600 trim to the PCI bus, but those plans have hit a snag and it might be awhile before we see another PCI videocard. Even though the PCI bus has been around since close to the dawn of time, not all motherboards stick to the same signaling implementation for the PCI interface, and Albatron fears that compatibility with different motherboards could become a problem.
Sam Nada, Albatron's International PR representative, says the company's engineers are working on optimizing the BIOS to ensure a smooth rollout, but it will be a couple of weeks before the new Retrotechnology cards make a debut. But what's a couple of weeks if you've already staved off the upgrade bug for this long?

Image Credit: Flickr social_d
![]()
Syntax
July 24, 2008 at 7:00pm
this is a great thing for people who want to run with 16 monitors and don't want to use break out boxes.
I know I'm sold
![]()
killerxx7
July 24, 2008 at 10:14am
the demand for this typ of card will be very low first of becuas eny one who play pc games will have atleast a agp bus and second of the pci bus will bottleneck the hell out of eny modern card so it will be a mager waste if time even if you buy one!
![]()
Talcum X
July 24, 2008 at 9:17am
PCI, as wonderful as it was to bring a standard 32bit bus to the PC market (booting VLB to the curb), doesnt need to be reincarnated. They shouldnt go further back than AGP. There would be a larger market there than PCI, IMO.
***********
Every morning is the dawn of a new error.















